Modern Governance: Flow, not Friction.
Governance is meant to help organizations make better decisions at scale.
But instead of being an enabler, it is too often experienced as a barrier - a system that slows decision-making, creates distance between decision-makers and stakeholders, and stifles action with its rigid and bureaucratic structures.
Old school governance isn't built for the myriad ways AI is changing how we work today.
โ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
Historically rooted in compliance, creating a reflexive focus on stopping bad outcomes rather than enabling good ones.
Asks, โCan we do this?โ but really ought to be asking, โHow might we do this well?โ
The focus on avoiding liability leads to excessive bureaucracy, procedural inertia, and the creation of governance as a defensive function rather than an adaptive one. It leads to friction and misery. It disperses accountability, rather than encouraging and rewarding action.
โ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐ป๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ฎ๐น๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป.
It is often managed separately from the business strategy itโs meant to support, operating in the silos of legal, compliance, and risk rather than as an integrated part of decision-making.
The "governance burden" is treated as a cost center rather than a system that enhances judgment, creativity, and alignment.
Because governance is imposed rather than co-created, it generates resistance rather than engagement.
โ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฐ๐๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐ถ๐๐ - ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐!
Many governance structures assume stable environments and clear hierarchiesโฆum, do you know anyone working in that world? Todayโs environment is volatile, complex, and interdependent.
Rules, policies, and approvals that once (supposedly) ensured clarity now create rigidity that slows responsiveness to emerging risks and opportunities.
Organizations fail to design governance for learning, adaptation, and decentralized decision-making.
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ?
๐โโ๏ธ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐น๐๐ถ๐ฑ, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ฐ. It should flex with market conditions, strategy shifts, and emergent risks.
๐ก ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐น๐น๐ถ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น. It should enable better judgment, pattern recognition, and learning across the organization.
๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ป๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น, ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฟ๐๐ฐ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น. It should create trust, shared accountability, and alignment rather than just enforcing compliance.
What do you think? Whatโs one governance gap that, if closed, would immediately unlock value for your organization?